First let me say that I have had zero interest in seeing “Avatar” from the very beginning. From what I read, it just didn’t excite me to the point where I would want to beat the drum for it, let alone see it. Besides, I don’t have time to go to movies anymore … although I saw “Star Trek” nine times last summer (because I’m a Trek fan). Anyway, I just happened to find a three hour window in my schedule with nothing to do, so I thought I’d add to James Cameron’s retirement fund.
This, by the way, was the first 3D movie I’d ever seen. By the time I started going to movies in the 60’s, Hollywood’s initial venture into 3D was over , so I’d never seen one before. I was actually kind of looking forward to THAT anyway. So, I sat myself down in my 13 dollar seat with my 15 dollars worth of food and settled in for my evening of ”Avatar” viewing. I expected to be, and was, blown away by the visual effects. But as the story progressed, I got the feeling that I’d seen this movie before. Then it dawned on me. And THEN it bothered me! I remembered Cameron saying that people were craving original storytelling. Original my foot. “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” in outer space. ”Dances With Wolves” on acid, to be honest … with a bit of ”The Empire Strkies Back” (the Imperial walkers), a dash of ”Shane” (noble gunfighter takes on a whole town), and a sprinkling of “How The West Was Won” (Yankee imperialism). I found the script to be weak … as in, there wasn’t a time that I didn’t know what was going to happen next. In short, I didn’t think ”Avatar” lived up to the hype. Would I recommend it? Yes … because it was so beautfiul to look at. Watch “Dances With Wolves” first. That way you’ll know the story and can just watch it for its beauty. If you haven’t seen it, and you DO go to see it, see it in 3D. Would I go see it again? Nah. “Gone With The Wind”, it ain’t.
Popularity: 4% [?]